萝卜AV视频

Purpose: Typically in response to a story the publication has recently published.
Length: Approximately 200鈥�250 words.
Title (optional): Congress Must Protect Education Funding in FY26

Dear Editor,

As a public-school superintendent in [Your District/Community], I was concerned to read your recent coverage of federal budget negotiations. This story [link the piece here] highlighted uncertainty for the coming fiscal year鈥攗ncertainty that directly impacts our students, educators, and families.

The U.S. House FY26 proposal would cut Title I by nearly $4 billion and eliminate Title II and Title III entirely鈥攑rograms our district relies on to support high-need students, strengthen teacher quality, and provide essential services for English learners. If enacted, these cuts would mean [describe specific impact: reduced reading specialists, fewer afterschool programs, larger class sizes, loss of professional development, etc.].

Fortunately, the Senate has advanced a bipartisan FY26 bill that maintains funding for core K鈥�12 programs and protects the decades-long schedule that ensures school districts receive these federal dollars by July 1. This guarantee matters: last summer, districts nationwide were forced to finalize budgets without knowing when or even if federal funds that had been appropriated by Congress would arrive.

I urge our congressional delegation to support the Senate鈥檚 responsible, bipartisan approach that sustains essential federal investments in education. Our students cannot afford damaging cuts鈥攁nd our schools cannot plan effectively when funding is delayed.

Our community鈥檚 future depends on these crucial federal dollars. Congress should adopt the Senate鈥檚 FY26 proposal and maintain our nation鈥檚 commitment to public education and, most importantly, to our children.

Sincerely,

[Name, Title, School District]

Purpose & Length: Approximately 600鈥�750 words, which is adaptable depending on specific publication requirements.
Title (optional): Schools Need Stability, Not Cuts: Congress Must Protect FY26 Education Funding

Recent reporting about the federal budget process underscores something those of us in public education know all too well: national debates in Washington have real consequences in our classrooms. As superintendent of [School District], serving [brief description of student population], I see the direct impact federal funding has on our students every day鈥攁nd how harmful proposed cuts would be to our community.

This year, the stakes are unusually high. Competing FY26 funding proposals in Congress would take our schools in dramatically different directions. The House Appropriations Committee advanced a bill that slashes Title I by nearly $4 billion and eliminates foundational formula programs like Title II and Title III altogether. These are not abstract numbers.

In [Your District], Title I supports [examples: literacy coaches, interventionists, classroom aides, reading/math specialists, tutoring programs, evidence-based interventions]. Title II makes it possible for us to [examples: provide teacher training, strengthen recruitment and retention, support new teachers]. Title III ensures high-quality services for our multilingual learners鈥攕tudents who bring incredible strengths and deserve the tools to succeed.

A cut of this magnitude would require school leaders to make painful decisions. It could mean [larger class sizes, reduced instructional time, cuts to arts or STEM programs, fewer counselors, loss of summer programming, etc.]. At a moment when students are working hard to recover academically and emotionally from the disruptions of recent years, these types of reductions could undermine the progress that has been made.

Contrast this with the bipartisan proposal from the Senate, which takes a far more responsible approach: maintaining funding for core K鈥�12 programs and directing the Administration to ensure these funds reach districts by July 1. This detail may seem technical, but its impact is enormous.

Last summer, districts across the country鈥攊ncluding ours鈥攂uilt budgets based on federal funds that have historically arrived every July. When that schedule was disrupted, school systems were left wondering if dollars that had been appropriated by Congress would ever materialize. No business, nonprofit, or local government could responsibly operate amid that level of instability鈥攁nd neither can public schools. The Senate bill restores predictability, ensuring the decades-long Congressional schedule of funds being delivered on time, by July 1.

Our community knows that student success is not accidental. It requires investment by teachers and staff, strong parental engagement, and financial resources for all our students.

Federal dollars make up a relatively small share of our budget, but they are often the most targeted, supporting students with the greatest needs. That鈥檚 why maintaining Title I, II, and III funding is not merely beneficial; it is essential.

This is not a partisan issue. It鈥檚 about ensuring that every child in every community has access to an excellent education and the opportunity to thrive and succeed.

I urge our elected officials in Congress to support the Senate鈥檚 bipartisan FY26 proposal and reject cuts that would harm students in [State/Region]. Our educators are working harder than ever. Our families depend on the services that our schools provide. And our children deserve a stable, well-funded education system so they can develop real skills for real life, enabling them to reach their full potential.

The decisions made in Washington will shape what is possible in classrooms here at home next fall. I hope our representatives choose to invest in the future of our community鈥攁nd most importantly in the future of our children.

[Name, Title, School District]