AI Strikes Again

Type: Article
Topics: Ethics, School Administrator Magazine

December 01, 2025

Ethical Educator

Scenario: 

A professor in the university’s superintendent preparation program is experimenting with multiple AI apps and uses the topic of a group presentation as a test case. On one platform, he discovers a word-for-word script of what a class member, a high school principal, had passed off as his own work in a group presentation. The university has no relevant policy, but the professor doesn’t consider it plagiarism because the words were not taken from another person. In terms of his own academic integrity, should the professor let this go, report it or confront the aspiring superintendent? An illustration of a robot seated drinking coffee and a man reading a paper while seated on the robot's lap

This Content is Exclusive to Members

Âܲ·AVÊÓÆµMember? Login to Access the Full Resource

Not a Member? Join Now | Learn More About Membership

The Ethical Educator panel consists of 

  • Sheldon H. Berman, author of Implementing Social-Emotional Learning: Insights from School Districts’ Successes and Setbacks.
  • Susan Enfield, executive director, University of Washington’s Center for Educational Leadership, Seattle, Wash.
  • Arthur Schwartz, president, ; and 
  • Maria G. Ott, Irving R. and Virginia A. Melbo chair in education administration, University of Southern California.

Each month, School Administrator draws on actual circumstances to raise an ethical decision-making dilemma in K-12 education. Our distinguished panelists provide their own resolutions to each dilemma.

Do you have a suggestion for a dilemma to be considered?
Send it to: magazine@aasa.org

Advertisement

Advertisement


Advertisement

Advertisement