2025 Summer Journal of Scholarship and Practice

The Summer 2025 issue of the ܲAVƵJournal of Scholarship and Practice begins the transition from the deeply appreciated and valued work of Editor Ken Mitchell as he hands the Journal off to Brian Osborne, Lehigh University’s Professor of Practice, College of Education. There will be more to come in the Fall issue. But in the meantime, the summer issue features two articles that at first glance look to be very different. On a closer look, though, readers will find that they both have in common what creates a successful environment for students. Or as outgoing editor Ken Mitchell’s words describe their commonality: individual and organizational improvement. 

The first research article is written by Tara Hornor and Lee Westberry and titled “Why Go to College? School Counselor Perceptions of the Benefits of College Attendance.” The purpose of the qualitative study was to look at school counselors’ beliefs about the major benefits associated with college attendance. Their findings indicated that school counselors focused on students’ individual benefits rather than broader societal impacts associated with college attendance. In the study, the participants identified four categories of benefits associated with college attendance, including career preparation, financial gains, knowledge expansion, and personal growth and development. If students are considering decisions about their post high school plans, this study provides helpful information of potential individual benefits.

The second article is evidence-based and takes the reader abroad to the U.K. With the intriguing title “’Low Trust’ and ‘High Trust’ Accountability in England and U.S.: Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution?” The authors are Robert Monson, Dan Jesse, Ann Castle and Malissa Leipold and they identify implications for strengthening instructional cultures. Participants in the Global Education Policy Leadership Program (GEPLP) in the U.S. collaborated with the Schools, Student and Teacher Network (SSAT) in England to study three high performing schools that are members of the SSAT. This article describes U.K. and U.S. educational accountability systems as based on trust level; shares observations of two voluntary accountability initiatives from low trust counties; and reviews two specific school effectiveness frameworks. Results from three schools in the UK revealed that there were several consistent themes related to the school improvement literature, such as leadership style, evidence-based continuous improvement, student engagement, community involvement and addressing equity challenges. Results from three schools in the UK revealed that there were several consistent themes related to the school improvement literature: leadership style, evidence-based continuous improvement, student engagement, community involvement, and addressing equity challenges. 

Advertisement

Staff

Thanks and Appreciation

The ܲAVƵJournal of Scholarship and Practice would like to thank AASA, ܲAVƵ, and in particular AASA’s Leadership Network, for its ongoing sponsorship of the Journal. We also offer special thanks to Kenneth Mitchell, Manhattanville University, for his efforts in selecting the articles that comprise this professional education journal and lending sound editorial comments to each volume. The unique relationship between research and practice is appreciated, recognizing the mutual benefit to those educators who conduct the research and seek out evidence-based practice and those educators whose responsibility it is to carry out the mission of school districts in the education of children. Without the support of ܲAVƵand Kenneth Mitchell, the ܲAVƵJournal of Scholarship and Practice would not be possible.

Interested in submitting an article? Learn more here

Additional Resources

Advertisement

Advertisement